"Hello! My name is Andy" said Andy
"Yeah! But I am going to call you John" Said Amy
"Well! that's not my name"
"I don't care, I will call you that, and all people who share language with me will call you that" Amy insisted.
If the conversation above does not seem a little strange then the writer has failed in his efforts altogether. What it should serve is a reminder of the fact that, countries and languages are called differently depending on who is saying the name. So for example, despite the fact that the Germans don't call themselves Germans, and intead call themselves "Deutsch" and their county is not called Germany, but "Deutschland" , speakers from English speaking countries call them Germans and Germany respectively. I really don't understand the difficulty in calling them what they call themselves. I mean that should be the right of an entity to be at least called what it desires to be called.
A little background check tells me what the terms exonym and endonym are, and no surprise that I am in utter disagreement with them. I think exonyms should only be employed when the identity of a particular group of people can not be ascertained with any reasonable authenticity and it is important to refer to them in some way. But when the identity and "name" of a group can be easily established and merely so by asking the simple question as to what their name is, its endonymistic name should always be used.
.
"Yeah! But I am going to call you John" Said Amy
"Well! that's not my name"
"I don't care, I will call you that, and all people who share language with me will call you that" Amy insisted.
If the conversation above does not seem a little strange then the writer has failed in his efforts altogether. What it should serve is a reminder of the fact that, countries and languages are called differently depending on who is saying the name. So for example, despite the fact that the Germans don't call themselves Germans, and intead call themselves "Deutsch" and their county is not called Germany, but "Deutschland" , speakers from English speaking countries call them Germans and Germany respectively. I really don't understand the difficulty in calling them what they call themselves. I mean that should be the right of an entity to be at least called what it desires to be called.
A little background check tells me what the terms exonym and endonym are, and no surprise that I am in utter disagreement with them. I think exonyms should only be employed when the identity of a particular group of people can not be ascertained with any reasonable authenticity and it is important to refer to them in some way. But when the identity and "name" of a group can be easily established and merely so by asking the simple question as to what their name is, its endonymistic name should always be used.
.